Is Singleton the Best Format for CCGs?

By Chris McGinty of AccordingToWhim.com

There is a format in Magic: The Gathering called Singleton where you build decks that can only have one copy of any card that’s not a basic land. The reason that this format was created was probably similar to the reason that Neal’s Draconian Banned List existed in the game of NetRunner. When the same decks keep getting used, gameplay has a tendency to become stale. Also, a deck can play very similarly each game if it’s built around the concept of having four copies of everything important. Singleton in Magic: The Gathering was probably created as a means by which to say a deck that plays slightly differently each game creates more variety of play.

While Nathan and I don’t shy away from constructed play in NetRunner, one of our favorite ways to play is to bust out a Starter Deck. The nice thing about Starter Decks is that while they were somewhat randomized, it was in a way that mostly played very balanced. This required certain assurance that the Corp had enough access to Agendas and the Runner had enough access to Icebreakers. These got their own rarity, known as Vital. Vital was like a common card, but a certain number of randomly selected Vitals were in every deck. A NetRunner Corp Starter Deck had to follow the rules for deck construction of a 60 card deck, and the Runner Starter Deck had to have enough Icebreakers of all three types. There was only one copy of each randomized card, and you got a good variety of play. This means that you could play multiple rounds NetRunner with two starter boxes and have decidedly different games most of the time.

When I learned of Neal’s Draconian Banned List, I decided to go through and create a Runner deck and a Corp deck that didn’t use any cards that were on the banned list. Because of the fact that I wanted to use as many cards as possible to get a feel for the format, I created the decks to be Singleton. The result was that out of all the constructed Decks that we ever made, these two were among Nathan’s favourites to play. I think that with a relatively lower power level and a variety of cards you would get to play, even though we were playing with only two decks, we tended to have a great variety of games.

I always sort of realized that even using Neal’s Draconian Banned List that there were probably decks that you could construct that would be somewhat broken, but I never really worried about trying to find out because we enjoyed playing with the Singleton decks so much. This was actually one of the big takeaways that I got from NetRunner in terms of tools for game design. The more variety that you can create out of simplicity, the better your game will be.

Let the Run Begin

by Chris McGinty of AccordingToWhim.com

In case you haven’t noticed, it’s officially 2020. In my mind, this means that it’s time to break out the NetRunner cards and pretty much play all year. In case you don’t know, NetRunner is a card game that was created by Richard Garfield. It initially had a 3-year run as a product of Wizards of the Coast, starting in 1996. After that, it had an 11-year run of not being in print. In 2012, Fantasy Flight Games was given license to publish NetRunner, and they publish it under the name Android: Netrunner. This went along for about 6 years, and then they did not renew their license with Wizards of the Coast.

I seem to be late to the game with NetRunner every single time. I first played around 2001 or 2002 when the game was already out of print. While I technically did play the Fantasy Flight version a few times, I was largely checked out on their version of the game even though there weren’t really that many differences. For some reason, I just felt like playing the original game if I was going to play it at all.

Over the years, I’ve considered the idea of trying to figure out how to acclimate to the Fantasy Flight versions of the cards by playing them with the original NetRunner game. I think that part of my issue was learning entirely new cards all at once. I realize how dumb this sounds given that people get used to new Magic the Gathering sets quickly enough. I simply had some sort of mental block to this version of the game. It’s because during the lean years there was a hope that the game would be picked back up, but I think we always presumed that you would be able to mix in your old cards.

I think the problem was twofold. The first is that while Fantasy Flight acquired the license to use the NetRunner game, I don’t think that they acquired the ability to use the Cyberpunk 2020 backdrop. This is likely why they went ahead and used their own IP of Android, which was a board game they published with its own characters and setting. The second reason they maybe didn’t make the cards playable with the old card backs of the original NetRunner game is because they included a trademark known as DeckMaster which was a Wizards of the Coast trademark that they abandoned after a few games. It probably would have made it awkward to use that when DeckMaster doesn’t even exist anymore.

Luckily, with the use of card sleeves I can probably mix some cards in and see how they play, so I can get used to them. I think one thing that I’d like to do going forward is perhaps even figure out combinations of cards that might actually work as interesting decks to play. It really just depends on how much opportunity I get to play NetRunner, and whether or not the cards even really mix that well.

I can already see issues with having to clarify that Walls and Barriers are effectively the same thing for all rules. Actions are effectively the same as clicks for all rules. Meanwhile, for the sake of balance I would imagine that there would have to be effectively two mechanics: one known as Trace and one unofficially known as Android Trace, so that the trace cards from the different games play differently.

There may be other rules to figure out a workaround, but I’m actually okay with the idea of trying to figure all this out over the course of 2020. This isn’t something that I’m going to hold myself to. It’s just something that I can do if time and opportunity permits.

Some thoughts on New Net Runner (Android NetRunner)

by Nathan Stout (of AccordingToWhim.com)

Chris and I have played a couple of games of the new version of Net Runner. As you may (or many not) know Chris and I have played Net Runner (the original one) for many years now and consider it an almost perfect CCG. Richard Garfield knew what the hell he was doing yo.

We have worked on many 'virtual expansion' card ideas and have play tested many, hoping one day that the game would see the light of day again. Lo and behold it happened last year. Fantasy Flight Games worked with Wizards of the Coast to bring out a new version of Net Runner that is very similar to the old version. We were excited but a little wary.

In the end they changed just a few things:

• Some terminology has changed.
• Link is just a value, no hiding bits then revealing.
• You now have 1 'identity' card that gives you a bonus.
• When you build decks, you have to pay attention to it's faction and can only add certain additional cards not in your faction (think Battle Tech CCG).
• There are no pre-con you can buy. It's their LCC so no boosters/starters. You have to build everything.

The art is there. One of the big complaints for the old game was that the art was 'too out there' for it's time. I think the art fit with the game theme but that is just me. The new stuff looks great. I'd prefer it to be a little darker in tone (the whole cyberpunk type thing) but I can't have everything.

The card design is one of areas I feel the new game falls short. In the old Net Runner you knew when a card was an Ice and when it was a Resource. The designs stood out. The new game's design is a bit soft and you have to focus on the middle of the card to read the card type. I am sure after many playings I will begin to memorize the designs, they just don't stick out at you as easily.

The gameplay is basically the same. The key to Net Runner's success is still there, asymmetrical gameplay with different cards for each side. The change of the Link is a good one and I'm not too hot on the identity simply because if it's ability is constant (throughout the game) you have remember you have it. There are some newer elements slipped into the game but they don't seem to alter the basic structure of the game.

The big fail for me and the only reason I am not foaming at the mouth over this game is the deck building aspect. I am IN LOVE with old Net Runner's pre-con starters. You could buy one starter pack and both of those decks played SO WELL against eachother. There are no pre-cons here. You have to build the decks yourself if you want to play at all. You can get online and look at people's
'power decks' but I really enjoyed the 'semi-randomness' of the old starters. I don't need to win in 3 turns, I need to have fun. Getting a starter to work for you is most of the fun, not a over powered 3 turn-win designed deck.

Finally I am having issues collecting this game. I want one of each card, in sheets, in a folder. The old Net Runner was grouped by Corp/Runner, then set, then card type, then by alpha. Easy enough. The new Net Runner is numbered. This means you have every type of card all mixed together, not good for organizing in any sort of display method for easy viewing. Oh well, small gripe.

Most of my issues will work themselves out with more and more play. It's a fun game and has still held onto it's uniqueness. Long live Net Runner.